Religie: hoeksteen of steen des aanstoots?

Auteurs

  • Joep de Hart Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/Protestantse Theologische Universiteit
  • Paul Dekker Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/Universiteit van Tilburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54195/RS.12885

Samenvatting

The Netherlands is a religious tolerant country; the Dutch are not very inclined to pay attention to the belief of politicians, and increasingly they prefer politics and religion to be separated. The picture of the developments in the past decades is mixed: clearly increased doubts about unlimited freedom of religion, a small drop in support for religion as a guide to political action, and a virtually unchanged support for denominational education. These findings suggest a growing awareness of potential negative aspects of religion, a declining role of religion in peoples own lives, and a stable positive attitude towards pluralism. The Netherlands is not a country that is only populated by descendants of Calvin and Voltaire. Among the population there are believers and unbelievers in all shapes and sizes. Between the non church members and church members there are in many points clear differences, but these also exist, outside the churches, between philosophical not interested unbelievers, the adherents of holistic spirituality and solo-religious people, and in church circles between nominal members and regular church goers.

Biografieën auteurs

Joep de Hart, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/Protestantse Theologische Universiteit

Joep de Hart is cultuur- en godsdienstsocioloog en werkzaam bij het Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau en de Protestantse Theologische Universiteit.

Paul Dekker, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/Universiteit van Tilburg

Paul Dekker is politicoloog en werkzaam bij het Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau en het departement Sociologie van de Universiteit van Tilburg.

Downloads

Gepubliceerd

01-06-2012

Citeerhulp

de Hart, J., & Dekker, P. (2012). Religie: hoeksteen of steen des aanstoots?. Religie &Amp; Samenleving, 7(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.54195/RS.12885
Received 2022-09-09
Published 2012-06-01