Bruin of paars

Een reactie op Peter van Rooden

Auteurs

  • Fred van Lieburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54195/RS.25017

Trefwoorden:

Dutch Christianity, civil religion, right extremism, religious history, historical fallacy

Samenvatting

This essay responds to Peter van Rooden’s critical review of the report God in the Netherlands 1966-2024 in this journal. Besides minor criticisms of the scope and methodology of the study (the research was limited to Christianity, as in all previous editions, and the authors’ commentaries were primarily intended to be informative, leaving interpretation and further research to specialists), Van Rooden criticizes the report’s characterization of Dutch ‘civil religion’ as a serious error. The use of this concept — which he associates with right-wing extremism — without examining Muslims ‘stinks of a brown sewer’. Because he emphasizes he is giving a political judgement of a scholarly work for the first time in his academic career, this response brings back to mind Van Rooden’s own interpretation of the so-called ‘purple unity’ of the Dutch religious regime, magnifying non-Christian liberalism while neglecting Islam and orthodox Protestantism (Van Rooden 1996). The critic falls on his own sword.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Biografie auteur

  • Fred van Lieburg, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Fred van Lieburg studeerde maatschappijgeschiedenis aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en is hoogleraar religiegeschiedenis aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Als directeur van het HDC Centre for Religious History organiseerde hij de presentatie van het onderzoek God in Nederland 1966-2024 op 25 april 2025.

Downloads

Gepubliceerd

12-12-2025

Citeerhulp

van Lieburg, F. (2025). Bruin of paars: Een reactie op Peter van Rooden. Religie & Samenleving, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.54195/RS.25017